2-minute sequence consisting of DNxHD clips, each of them with a source-side color correction, save for one. And neither are rendered sequences, of course. Video mixdowns are not the end-all for every workflow. ![]() IMHO no method is superior, depends on workflow and project. If at any point you want to change anything, the mixdown is not as flexible as the rendered sequence. Having your final version mixed down to a master clip (although without the sound unless you mix that down and AutoSync) can be an advantage in certain workflows. Whether the mixdown or the render is faster also depends on the amount of non-rendered effects. The resulting Same-As-Source export is equally fast. Cutting, adding effects, some of them realtime, then before export, you either render the whole thing, or do a video mixdown. I'm talking about a sequence with MXF media generated from the get go. ![]() ![]() Pat, your example is confusing, as you are not just 'rendering' but transcoding.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |